Address the housing crisis through a number of initiatives
Norm was proud to support the bipartisan economic stimulus package in order to put money back into the pockets of working Minnesota families and encourage economic growth through small business tax incentives. Additionally, Coleman is continuing to lead
efforts to reduce our addiction to foreign oil through a number of measures including drastic expansion of domestic renewable fuels, increased mileage requirements, deep-water drilling off of US coasts, and increased production of nuclear,
clean-coal and additional domestic energy resources. He is actively working to address the housing crisis through a number of initiatives, including making mortgage debt tax-free and reforming the Federal Housing Administration to enable more homeowners
to obtain safer mortgages. Norm is also pushing to make Community Development Block Grant funding available for communities hit hard by the crisis, as well as allowing people to use their retirement funds, without penalty, to remain in their homes.
Source: Campaign website, www.colemanforsenate.com
Aug 12, 2008
Voted NO on paying down federal debt by rating programs' effectiveness.
Amendment intends to pay down the Federal debt and eliminate government waste by reducing spending on programs rated ineffective by the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART).
Proponents recommend voting YES because:
My amendment says we are going to take about $18 billion as a strong signal from the Congress that we want to support effective programs and we want the taxpayer dollars spent in a responsible way. My amendment doesn't take all of the $88 billion for the programs found by PART, realizing there may be points in time when another program is not meeting its goals and needs more money. So that flexibility is allowed in this particular amendment. It doesn't target any specific program.
Almost worse than being rated ineffective, we have programs out there that have made absolutely no effort at all to measure their results. I believe these are the worst offenders. In the following years, I hope Congress will look at those programs to create accountability.
Opponents recommend voting NO because:
The effect of this amendment will simply be to cut domestic discretionary spending $18 billion. Understand the programs that have been identified in the PART program are results not proven. Here are programs affected: Border Patrol, Coast Guard search and rescue, high-intensity drug trafficking areas, LIHEAP, rural education, child abuse prevention, and treatment. If there is a problem in those programs, they ought to be fixed. We ought not to be cutting Border Patrol, Coast Guard search and rescue, high-intensity drug trafficking areas, LIHEAP, rural education, and the rest. I urge a "no" vote.
Voted YES on $40B in reduced federal overall spending.
Vote to pass a bill that reduces federal spending by $40 billion over five years by decreasing the amount of funds spent on Medicaid, Medicare, agriculture, employee pensions, conservation, and student loans. The bill also provides a down-payment toward hurricane recovery and reconstruction costs.
Reference: Work, Marriage, and Family Promotion Reconciliation Act;
Bill S. 1932
; vote number 2005-363
on Dec 21, 2005
